• Hi all and welcome to TheWoodHaven2 brought into the 21st Century, kicking and screaming! We all have Alasdair to thank for the vast bulk of the heavy lifting to get us here, no more so than me because he's taken away a huge burden of responsibility from my shoulders and brought us to this new shiny home, with all your previous content (hopefully) still intact! Please peruse and feed back. There is still plenty to do, like changing the colour scheme, adding the banner graphic, tweaking the odd setting here and there so I have added a new thread in the 'Technical Issues, Bugs and Feature Requests' forum for you to add any issues you find, any missing settings or just anything you'd like to see added/removed from the feature set that Xenforo offers. We will get to everything over the coming weeks so please be patient, but add anything at all to the thread I mention above and we promise to get to them over the next few days/weeks/months. In the meantime, please enjoy!

Record SS...DUN

Woodbloke

Sequoia
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
7,594
Reaction score
1,714
Location
Salisbury, UK
I've just received this little beauty in the post:

0909D438-2709-4C5A-9FC4-46C74BF1C9CF.jpg

IMG_8397.jpeg



It appears to have unvarnished Rosewood handles and a hight front knob and with that style of machined frog I'm guessing it's quite old. Hopefully @AndyT could shed some light on it's approximate date of manufacture? - Rob
 
Last edited:
All I know is to take note of what keen collectors have studied, deduced and shared, eg here:


Rosewood suggests it's before WW2 and Stayset that it's after 1931. You'll need to work through details not shown in your photo - which was plenty clear enough to show it's a happy day in Salisbury!
 
All I know is to take note of what keen collectors have studied, deduced and shared, eg here:


Rosewood suggests it's before WW2 and Stayset that it's after 1931. You'll need to work through details not shown in your photo - which was plenty clear enough to show it's a happy day in Salisbury!
Thanks Andy. Looking briefly through the linkie you kindly sent it's got a Lateral Lever No.4 pattern (1952>57) and a Frog pattern which ended in 1956, so if I were to plump for half way between those dates, around 1954 seems to be a reasonable guestimation? I'll do a bit more sleuthing tonight using the info you've given me. Thanks again - Rob...happy days indeed in Salisbury!
 
There's always the problem that owners can swap or upgrade features, particularly those parts where people have strong preferences, such as the handles and the Stayset option. I don't know any more details myself and only have a few Record planes of my own.
 
There's always the problem that owners can swap or upgrade features, particularly those parts where people have strong preferences, such as the handles and the Stayset option. I don't know any more details myself and only have a few Record planes of my own.
I thought that the handle/tote were Rosewood, but having taken off the handle and sanded the underside it's Beech, so definitely post WW2. Cutter is the original pattern as well, dating up to the mid 50's when it was altered - Rob...who may make some new ones out of proper, pukka Rosewood
 
Last edited:
I thought that the handle/tote were Rosewood, but having taken off the handle and sanded the underside it's Beech, so definitely post WW2. Cutter is the original pattern as well, dating up to the mid 50's when it was altered - Rob...who may make some new ones out of proper, pukka Rosewood
That should confuse the next owner! 😃
 
That should confuse the next owner! 😃
Hopefully :ROFLMAO:

IMG_8398.jpeg

I think the handle/tote aren't original as they didn't fit properly and I suspect they were changed sometime in the past. The rear handle nut is also too small for the hole and when it's fully tightened the nut surface isn't coplanar with the top...there's a wee 'step' on one side which makes me think that it's not the original handle - Rob
 
Last edited:
Not a full restoration in any way, shape or form, but simply a really good spruce up and attempting to ensure a closer mating fit of the frog to the body:

IMG_8401 2.jpeg

The front underside of the frog (arrowed) wasn't really flat, so the burr that had taken all the pressure (hence shiny) over the decades was made flat using a few strokes of a 6" smoothing file. The frog seating on the main body was cleaned up using a dowel in the pillar drill coated with coarse valve grinding paste, so burrs and high spots have been removed. Once all the screw threads had been oiled (3 in 1):

FFCFC9DF-6B1D-426F-BA95-AE8D90FE61A6.jpg

...the frog was reassembled onto the plane body. Next job is to sort out some Rosewood for the front knob and handle - Rob
 
I have had records with a rosewood knob and beech tote, i guess they using up what they had left over.

Pete
 
Or the original rosewood handle broke at some point as they often do? But I think you are right that the transition was a gradual one.
 
I hate making handles for planes...probably one of the hardest things to do when it comes to fitting the angled rod, but by COP:

IMG_8408.jpeg

...yesterday I'd got this far. The amount off faffing around it takes is unbelievable; mating frog surfaces cleaned up with a dowel dunked in valve grinding paste spinning in the pillar drill - Rob
 
I was wondering why you are putting yourself through all this if you don't enjoy it - but presumably it's a favour for someone else?
 
I have a long series 6mm drill bit reground as a lip and spur bit that goes right the way through, but not enough travel on the quill so I have to stop and wind the table up. Clamping the rack to the pillar keeps it in alignment.
I drill the counter bore in the top and bottom first before the through hole it really helps to reduce tear out round the hole.


Pete
 
I was wondering why you are putting yourself through all this if you don't enjoy it - but presumably it's a favour for someone else?
The plane was a gift Andy and the handle/knob were horrid, worm eaten, covered in thick gloopy, badly applied stain so they had to go, but an hour's worth of bandsawing, rasp work together with a bit of powered sanding resulted in:

IMG_8411.jpeg

...this; slightly fatter than the original, which was too skinny anyway. Needs a whole load of hand sanding now, but it's essentially done - Rob
 
It's now changed from a decent 'user' with grotty handles to something that's a little better:

IMG_8413.jpeg

IMG_8414.jpeg

...and the front knob with 'V' cut detailing:

IMG_8416.jpeg

As mentioned above, it's not a full restoration project or anything like, but a general clean up, thead oiling (never been done) as well as a new front knob and handle in Indian Rosewood, so now it's a much more pleasant 'user' than it was a couple of days ago. Although there's absolutely nothing wrong with the original Record cutter, I've decided to treat it to a new Japanese blade from Workshop Heaven as I recollect that some while ago @Eric the Viking mentioned how good they were, having purchased one or two from Ax aeons ago. You won't be surprised (or maybe you will) to learn that Classic Hand Tools sell something similar for over twice the price, which is more than a bit steep!! - Rob

Edit - Indian Rosewood finished with two coats of Odie's Oil and a slathering of smelly Alfie Shine
 
Last edited:
I have a long series 6mm drill bit reground as a lip and spur bit that goes right the way through, but not enough travel on the quill so I have to stop and wind the table up. Clamping the rack to the pillar keeps it in alignment.



Pete
That's painfully clever Pete!, and yet so simple at the same time...sounds waaay more straight forward than my Heath Robinson arrangement,
and ponderings regarding a big square/flat & plumb stud, for the table apron..
or even thoughts regarding a thicker walled column with a slot, for a spring pin to engage with.
Slightly miffed, an understatment, why the heck wasn't this wasn't suggested to my thick skull before?,
as I posted on having this exact problem previously.

Care to add a little more details/provide some links if possible?
I'd like to see what clamping arrangements were neseccairy, and Perhaps some other for bits of info.

Wouldn't ya think the manufactures could elaborate on this idea, as it sounds like this extremely useful function could be done very cheaply...
I'd be out experimenting on this, though a fools errand for me now, due to already having this function, combined with the dodgy quill, arbour, bearings, and chuck.. Lol.
Would love to see someone demonstrate this indexed drilling tip with a machine in trustworthy condition.
Cheers
Tom
 
Last edited:
Back
Top