• Hi all and welcome to TheWoodHaven2 brought into the 21st Century, kicking and screaming! We all have Alasdair to thank for the vast bulk of the heavy lifting to get us here, no more so than me because he's taken away a huge burden of responsibility from my shoulders and brought us to this new shiny home, with all your previous content (hopefully) still intact! Please peruse and feed back. There is still plenty to do, like changing the colour scheme, adding the banner graphic, tweaking the odd setting here and there so I have added a new thread in the 'Technical Issues, Bugs and Feature Requests' forum for you to add any issues you find, any missing settings or just anything you'd like to see added/removed from the feature set that Xenforo offers. We will get to everything over the coming weeks so please be patient, but add anything at all to the thread I mention above and we promise to get to them over the next few days/weeks/months. In the meantime, please enjoy!

Dunkirk

Jimmy Mack

Old Oak
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
0
Location
Leeds, West Yorkshire
Just back from an afternoon break with Mrs Mack... Chicken Chimichangas then a visit to the cinema to watch DUNKIRK.

Excellent movie, go see.

Jim

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
 
Rod":t7vhs4ea said:
Gets good reviews

Rod

Not in The Times 2/5 stars.

Interesting programme recently about the unfairness that the RAF received from those on the beaches thinking that the RAF weren't doing anything to help them. When the complete opposite was true.
 
RogerS":373186ry said:
Rod":373186ry said:
Gets good reviews

Rod

Not in The Times 2/5 stars.

Interesting programme recently about the unfairness that the RAF received from those on the beaches thinking that the RAF weren't doing anything to help them. When the complete opposite was true.
I suspect that review will be back to bite the reviewer on the butt, perhaps their popcorn was stale.... Considering Bradshaw gave it 5 stars, which is quite rare.

I'm no aficionado on the subject, but interesting point on the RAF involvement or supposed lack of... there is a nod to this.... Which I now get, thanks Roger.

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
 
My father was a L/bdr in a Royal Artillery Field Regiment in the BEF. His regiment and battery was one of the last to leave because they were providing the rearguard bombardment. In fact his service record shows his return was the day after the operation officially finished.

He came back on a Margate pleasure steamer called Royal Daffodil; it received a direct hit from a Stuka's bomb, but it didn't explode, but left a dirty great hole in the hull. They stuffed it with mattresses to get them home.

Like many of his generation, he rarely spoke about the war, but in the loft at our council house in the 50s, was a holdall and wallet, each with a hole in where some shrapnel went through as he crossed the beach.

I'm here because he got back. I'd rather not see the film because of that, as good as it might be.
 
I'm going to see it in a few minutes.

As far as the RAF getting knocked by the guys on the ground, that's gonna happen. I have a great-uncle (96 & still sharp as a tack) who was in the Marines on Guadalcanal in 1942. He still blames the Navy for abandoning them there, when the Japanese had effective control of the sea around the island after the first night naval battle there. (He won't talk much about it either, though I did get some details from him because (a) I was in the military also, and (b) I asked questions around the edges to get him started talking, rather than going straight for the gore. My father, who wasn't in the military and asked the obvious questions, couldn't get much out of him at all.)

Kirk
 
Back
Top