• Hi all and welcome to TheWoodHaven2 brought into the 21st Century, kicking and screaming! We all have Alasdair to thank for the vast bulk of the heavy lifting to get us here, no more so than me because he's taken away a huge burden of responsibility from my shoulders and brought us to this new shiny home, with all your previous content (hopefully) still intact! Please peruse and feed back. There is still plenty to do, like changing the colour scheme, adding the banner graphic, tweaking the odd setting here and there so I have added a new thread in the 'Technical Issues, Bugs and Feature Requests' forum for you to add any issues you find, any missing settings or just anything you'd like to see added/removed from the feature set that Xenforo offers. We will get to everything over the coming weeks so please be patient, but add anything at all to the thread I mention above and we promise to get to them over the next few days/weeks/months. In the meantime, please enjoy!

Picture frames, why mitres?

ScaredyCat

Sapling
Joined
Nov 25, 2020
Messages
261
Reaction score
0
Location
North Suffolk
I have some picture frames to make and I was just wondering why they're made with mitres. Why not, even single, dovetails? Shirley the joint would be stronger, even comb joints would be stronger. Given that people have been making picture frames for longer than I've been alive, why are they still made with mitres?
 
ScaredyCat":m4ya9m31 said:
I have some picture frames to make and I was just wondering why they're made with mitres. Why not, even single, dovetails? Shirley the joint would be stronger, even comb joints would be stronger. Given that people have been making picture frames for longer than I've been alive, why are they still made with mitres?

If the frame has any sort of decorative profile then only a mitre joint can be used surely?

Bob
 
9fingers":2x1kaw6u said:
ScaredyCat":2x1kaw6u said:
I have some picture frames to make and I was just wondering why they're made with mitres. Why not, even single, dovetails? Shirley the joint would be stronger, even comb joints would be stronger. Given that people have been making picture frames for longer than I've been alive, why are they still made with mitres?

If the frame has any sort of decorative profile then only a mitre joint can be used surely?

Bob
I think that's it, given that many commercial picture frames have some sort of profiled, decorative section - Rob
 
I've seen really nice picture frames made with bridled mitres for fancy effect, but yes as already been said if there's a face profile the only way it will tidily wrap around is with a mitre joint.

If you've got a plain frame there's no reason you couldn't mortice and tenon, dovetail lap, half lap, or any other kind of joint.
 
9fingers":xagnn2pb said:
If the frame has any sort of decorative profile then only a mitre joint can be used surely?

Is that only the case if you profile the material first? I understand that's the normal process, but stuff isn't always made the simplest way possible, just because it's simple.
 
ScaredyCat":3rym79ry said:
9fingers":3rym79ry said:
If the frame has any sort of decorative profile then only a mitre joint can be used surely?

Is that only the case if you profile the material first? I understand that's the normal process, but stuff isn't always made the simplest way possible, just because it's simple.

True. If your profile is a simple one and can be say routed in after assembly then provided you have ensured that the profile will not break through into the joint, then there should not be a problem.

I've not done a lot picture framing but have always made the stock by the mile first as I think it is the easiest by far. The mitres can be strengthened with feathers if needed - decorative or otherwise or plates stuck on the back.

Bob
 
9fingers":eox0qwsr said:
True. If your profile is a simple one and can be say routed in after assembly then provided you have ensured that the profile will not break through into the joint, then there should not be a problem.

I've not done a lot picture framing but have always made the stock by the mile first as I think it is the easiest by far. The mitres can be strengthened with feathers if needed - decorative or otherwise or plates stuck on the back.

Bob
I've done loads of picture frames over the decades and I always keep it simple with a flat, rectangular section. I find that if you can use a really decent, well figured bit of material for the frame, you don't really need much else. This is one I did...

IMG_5311.jpg

...a couple of years ago. It's an antique Japanese woodblock print of a pair of Red Crowned Cranes, using a book matched, English Walnut frame and 4mm Bog Oak splines. I usually (not always) use a mount and I always get it professionally cut; this one (as do most of my pics) uses a 'Hayseed' double mount with 'Clarity' near museum quality, non reflective glass. It's also important to have slightly more mount at the bottom to give some visual weight.

Too much faffing around with decorative mouldings tends, in my very 'umble opinion to detract from the subject matter of the picture rather than enhance it - Rob
 
Forgive me if this has been mentioned already, but why not a scribed "cope and stick"(is that the term?). Like you might use on a panelled door?
I expect there's a good reason, but I haven't twigged it yet.
 
John Brown":s3gp78d3 said:
Forgive me if this has been mentioned already, but why not a scribed "cope and stick"(is that the term?). Like you might use on a panelled door?
I expect there's a good reason, but I haven't twigged it yet.

That would work with the end grain suitable dealt with. I guess it is a case of unconventional rather than right or wrong.

Bob
 
Back
Top