RogerS":jlo37dy7 said:That's it. They're 'avin' a laugh. Won't bother again.
Yep, the foreigners in my family beat me today :evil:
RogerS":jlo37dy7 said:That's it. They're 'avin' a laugh. Won't bother again.
Phil":3exqnsid said:Mine has not kicked over to the new day, still stuck on frame.
Robert":2ea9yrc3 said:Saw the clues, got it in two.
Very annoying that spellings that are wrong here are included.
What can I say? Prophecy and trend-setting are my crosses to bear. :eusa-whistle: :lol:Alf over a week ago":cow8lj6b said:...I'm stopping this now before I have to spell everything 'Murrican fashion. Do me a favor. :eusa-snooty:
John Brown":20vzizow said:Once you know that US spelling is used it makes little difference.
In my opinion.
Anyway, since the New York times has bought the game, even if Josh Wardle had stuck to British English, it would've been changed.
Maybe you should try nerdle. No spelling, and I don't belie ve the numbers are large enough for confusion over what constitutes a billion. Although we all know we devalued ours for US/UK harmony many decades ago.
Dr.Al":2r7y02gv said:John Brown":2r7y02gv said:Once you know that US spelling is used it makes little difference.
In my opinion.
Anyway, since the New York times has bought the game, even if Josh Wardle had stuck to British English, it would've been changed.
Maybe you should try nerdle. No spelling, and I don't belie ve the numbers are large enough for confusion over what constitutes a billion. Although we all know we devalued ours for US/UK harmony many decades ago.
The thing I don't like about nerdle is how often there will be lots of "anagrams" (if that's the right words). I did one a couple of days ago that the answer was something like:
45+32=87
Even once you've got the + and the =87 and know every other digit, you can have
35+42=87
42+35=87
32+45=87
all are valid sums. There are fewer valid patterns with a word than you can get with an equation.
John Brown":9i57k1fl said:Yes, but it's well known that the bard didn't spell his own name the same way twice in his lifetime.
Andyp":1jfq6rqg said:I couldn't agree more Phil,
Phil":1sszlnpl said:
The Guess Distribution statistics are incorrect.
Mine was reset to zero when I cleaned up history and cookies the other day.
It reflects 1 for 3 whereas it should be 2 for 3 (3 yesterday and 3 today)
Maybe the NYT is the problem?
9fingers":3svpkmnr said:Any favoured strategies for the first guess?
I've tended to use yesterdays answer* but wondering about AUDIO or ADIEU for example to tease out most of the vowels to start with.
Have there been any instances of one letter used twice? I guess not as the results would be ambiguous say with one letter in the correct position and the second used one potentially in the wrong place.
*guaranteed not to get it in one go but gotta start somewhere!
Bob
TrimTheKing":3t86czs6 said:Phil":3t86czs6 said:
The Guess Distribution statistics are incorrect.
Mine was reset to zero when I cleaned up history and cookies the other day.
It reflects 1 for 3 whereas it should be 2 for 3 (3 yesterday and 3 today)
Maybe the NYT is the problem?
Nope, there’s a warning that popped up that said the scores are based on cookies and if you clear them you will lose your cumulative score.
I saw it when it first popped up.
Phil":rw3b4v5e said:TrimTheKing":rw3b4v5e said:Phil":rw3b4v5e said:
The Guess Distribution statistics are incorrect.
Mine was reset to zero when I cleaned up history and cookies the other day.
It reflects 1 for 3 whereas it should be 2 for 3 (3 yesterday and 3 today)
Maybe the NYT is the problem?
Nope, there’s a warning that popped up that said the scores are based on cookies and if you clear them you will lose your cumulative score.
I saw it when it first popped up.
I did clear out everything when it would not load the new day.
I keep my own log.