Steve Maskery
Old Oak
I've had an account here for yonks, but didn't want the hassle of maintaining two parallel conversations. But, like me or loathe me, here I am 
No not received anything, Andy, but thank you.AndyT":2lwcjrap said:Excellent news. I've sent you an email but the address you gave earlier today was incomplete (while it was still visible) so it may not have reached you.
Yes, I got yours, thank you.Argus":mwbu5hd8 said:Hello, welcome and likewise about the email...... not sure if I got the address right.
After 18 years it's time for me too.
Inertia and a misguided sense of loyalty! LOL!9fingers":ei9cjqok said:Hi Steve, What kept you? lol
Bob
Steve Maskery":2v716kce said:Actually, Bob, there was another reason, IIRC.
The colour scheme was very difficult to use in the early days. I think there may have been some edits, as it doesn't seem so bad now. The orange/tan text on a pale grey background is very dificult to read, not much contrast. I can't read it at all. OK, most people have better eyesight than I do (my left eye is packing up altogether, I'm hoping the magicians can fix it next year), but that's the way it is.
As the Printing industry maxim goes, , "Black on white, always right".
S
<chunter> "I dunno, he's only been here five minutes and he's grumbling already!" </chunter>
9fingers":o8ruaqzv said:Steve, I think some browsers have a high contrast optional extension which might help you.
Bob
Steve Maskery":2e59et1e said:9fingers":2e59et1e said:Steve, I think some browsers have a high contrast optional extension which might help you.
Bob
Ooh, I'll have to look into that. Thank you.
S
Strong smell of that...It was supposed to be steve@workshopessentials.com, but perhaps it got edited before it was removed.
novocaine":hwpzi675 said:Well their goes the neighbourhood.
This was once a place of high brow entertainment, now it seems you'll let anyone in.
Hi steve. Welcome back.
Lurker":1zsxj7on said:novocaine":1zsxj7on said:Well their goes the neighbourhood.
This was once a place of high brow entertainment, now it seems you'll let anyone in.
Hi steve. Welcome back.
They sent me to see what the defences were like, then the rest of the rif raf followed![]()
Steve Maskery":19j1j0rj said:Actually, Bob, there was another reason, IIRC.
The colour scheme was very difficult to use in the early days. I think there may have been some edits, as it doesn't seem so bad now. The orange/tan text on a pale grey background is very dificult to read, not much contrast. I can't read it at all. OK, most people have better eyesight than I do (my left eye is packing up altogether, I'm hoping the magicians can fix it next year), but that's the way it is.
As the Printing industry maxim goes, , "Black on white, always right".
S
<chunter> "I dunno, he's only been here five minutes and he's grumbling already!" </chunter>
TrimTheKing":2x1gywia said:I do remember that conversation from a while back now you mention it. In the not too distant future we will be looking to do a wholesale upgrade of the forum software an given the colour them doesn't exist in newer version I will be mindful to make sure that the new colour scheme is friendlier to the visually less gifted.
And please let me know if it really is that bad for you that you don't want to use the forum because changing to one of the default theme's is literally the work of a couple of clicks of the mouse, which I'd much rather do than have people unable to read things.

Trevanion":2erhyc5u said:It doesn't really bother me at all but I know a couple of people are reluctant to join up because of the dated layout of the site and the colour scheme is a bit funky.
That said, I think everytime the other place had an update it was met with "Boo! Hiss! it was better before!" Excepting the recent update which was widely praised once people came to grips with it, the only people that didn't like it were the ones that used Tapatalk exclusively. That particular software isn't cheap though by the time you've got all the bells and whistles.